Yet, Argument A is still held out as somehow “more valid”, and Argument B is looked down upon. Therefore, Argument B is completely invalid, as long as a host computer has just enough resources to run the VS and record it at once.Īssuming Argument B were true, loosing some CPU cycles temporarily is far less of a hassle and expense than purchasing much more expensive hardware and the things needed to connect it to the recording device, deal with space issues, etc. – Argument B / When a good sounding VS shows up people complain about it eating cpu resourcesĪssuming Argument A were true, people in the position of Argument B should have no issues with simply committing the virtual synth track as audio, since one would assume this is a necessary and regular part of Argument A workflow. Hilarious to hear all the contradicting viewpoints on analog vs not. That way we can all explore this instrument without any prejudice and be surprised and lifted to bliss by our own tweaking. I would like to suggest to Urs to leave it like that and not put any preset in the official release. On my 8core DIVA behaves and sounds very convincing. The focus is spreaded over computer and different machines….warming up….cable clutter….transport….etc….
#U he diva price software#
To immediately integrate my system100 in a logic or live project like I can with software like DIVA is impossible. Hardware is difficult to use efficiently in commercial driven surroundings…time is money….many big clubtunes are created with software nowadays….nothing wrong with that. The advantage of software is of coourse ease of use and flexibility and total recall and saving options etc…. A leap forward in soundquality of software synths just like imposcar 2 was earlier this year. The voice mapping is a wonderful feature.įor me after one evening (and a part of the night…that says already somethin….haha ) of testing and creating patches, I can only say: DIVA a wonderful software synth. Urs implemented some very nice features to try to emulate the instability of true analog. Still, attempts like Urs ‘ DIVA are very intriguing to me.Įvery year software comes closer to sounding like true analog hardware. System 100, Andromeda, MS20, monopoly SH101 CS30, TR808 909 303 ,ebbe und flut filter etc…. Somehow I have the feeling that the people who always mention that software should not be taken seriously are prejudiced and sometimes do not own any hardware themselves
#U he diva price for mac#
Become an early adopter, play an active role in development as we nurture this baby to perfection over the next few weeks…Ĭheck this site often, subscribe to us on Twitter or Facebook as we unveil more details, post audio demos and offer more insight into the making of Diva.ĭiva will be available for Mac & PC Wednesday November 16th, 2011. The beta version works without restriction until December 31st. The behaviour of our zero-delay-feedback filters when pushed to the limit clearly demonstrates the advantages of this groundbreaking approach. This comes at the cost of quite a high CPU-hit, but we think it was worth it: Diva is the first native software synth that applies methods from industrial circuit simulators (e.g. Modules can be mixed and matched so you can build hybrids, but what sets DIVA apart is the sheer authenticity of the analogue sound. The oscillators, filters and envelopes closely model components found in some of the great monophonic and polyphonic synthesizers of yesteryear. It might not fit our definition of a monster synth – but maybe a virtual monster synth!
#U he diva price windows#
U-he has introduced Diva, a new software synthesizer for Windows and Mac that they call ‘a new monster synthesizer’.
0 kommentar(er)
